Peruvian farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya and global energy giant RWE have finally begun a landmark legal case that can set a precedent on corporate climate accountability.
Reuters detailed that oral hearings were held in Hamm, Germany, in March, marking the beginning of a legal battle that's a decade in the making.
Lliuya, a farmer from Huaraz, Peru, filed a lawsuit against RWE, a German electric power company, in 2015.
Lliuya said that RWE has generated an estimated 0.5% of the planet's heat-trapping pollution since the Industrial Revolution. This has contributed to the melting of Andean glaciers that subsequently caused Laguna Pacacocha lake waters to rise, thus increasing the risk of flooding in Huaraz, where Lliuya's farmland is. The 44-year-old has demanded that RWE pay the equivalent fraction of flood protection costs in the area — around $18,520 toward a $3.5 million flood defense project.
When the case was first filed, the regional court in Essen dismissed it. In 2017, Lliuya went to the Higher Regional Court in Hamm to appeal the case. The suit was admitted and allowed to move forward with gathering evidence. On March 17 and 19, 2025, the first oral hearings were finally held.
The court heard expert findings that indicate a 3% flood risk to Huaraz over the next 30 years.
Save $10,000 on solar panels without even sharing your phone number Want to go solar but not sure who to trust? EnergySage has your back with free and transparent quotes from fully vetted providers that can help you save as much as $10k on installation. To get started, just answer a few questions about your home — no phone number required. Within a day or two, EnergySage will email you the best local options for your needs, and their expert advisers can help you compare quotes and pick a winner. |
However, RWE argues that no single emitter can be held responsible for rising temperatures. If Lliuya wins, they say, every motorist could be held liable for their emissions.
This dispute goes beyond one farmer and one company. According to Reuters, senior attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law Sebastien Duyck said, "Legal experts are watching closely to understand the extent to which this is going ... to set a strong precedent."
If Lliuya wins, it could pave the way for future legal actions against major polluters. Instead of people like Lliuya taking on corporate giants alone, strong legal precedents can compel major polluters to reduce their emissions or face steep costs.
The court's decision on the Lliuya vs. RWE case could take time, but it's sparking important conversations. Whatever the outcome, this case could reshape how corporations are held responsible for their environmental impact.
TCD Picks » Upway Spotlight
💡Upway makes it easy to find discounts of up to 60% on premium e-bike brands
As program director Nikki Reisch said in a CIEL press release, "Investors face a choice: stop funding climate destruction or go down with it."
|
Do you think fracking should be illegal in America? Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. |
Yes — everywhere 👏 
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Cool Picks
